India’s obsession with the politics of hand-weaving means clothes exports are falling sharply.
And they were in a surprisingly mediocre position to start with. In the financial year to February, they fell 4% on the previous year – and in February alone they fell over 10% on 2017. The bizarre demonetisation project is one cause, as is the rupee’s 6% appreciation.
The columnist cited is confused about trade treaties: as far as clothing is concerned, Indian clothes are treated exactly the same way in the US as clothes from Bangladesh, Vietnam and China, and of these three only Bangladesh has an advantage over India in Europe. But on this the columnist shares the confusion of India’s government.
India’s last economic survey showed how it needs new jobs creating in India on a scale only garment exporting can manage. Making volume clothes is 240 times more labour-intensive than the steel works Indian businesspeople love investing in – and the survey forgets to mention those Indian businesspeople invest in steelworks most readily if they’re in some other country.
The columnist is right to say India needs free trade deals with the West. America doesn’t want deals with India though. With both the EU and Britain’s Brexiteers, the current Indian government makes absurd demands to protect domestic industrialists in categories like insurance that would create Indian jobs whatever nationality the owner is. Or it wants preferential access to visas so the rich can get their children impressive-sounding jobs abroad. Since, predictably, Europe won’t cooperate with either demand, India doesn’t get the apparel jobs desperately poor Indians need.
Indians are forever pointing out the need for more jobs making clothes. In all the time I’ve been writing these columns, I’ve not heard a single Indian come out with a straightforward proposal for getting any of those jobs.
But those handloom weavers the current government loves so much make lovely photo-ops.